Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Read the full transcript of The Times interview
British combat forces are no longer needed to maintain security in southern Iraq and should leave the country, Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi Prime Minister, has told The Times.
In an exclusive interview in Baghdad, Mr al-Maliki also criticised a secret deal made last year by Britain with the al-Mahdi Army, Iraq’s largest Shia militia. He said that Basra had been left at the mercy of militiamen who “cut the throats of women and children” after the British withdrawal from the city.
The Iraqi leader emphasised, however, that the “page had been turned” and he looked forward to a friendly, productive relationship with London. “The Iraqi arena is open for British companies and British friendship, for economic exchange and positive cooperation in science and education.”
Of Britain’s presence in southern Iraq, Mr al-Maliki said: “We thank them for the role they have played, but I think that their stay is not necessary for maintaining security and control. There might be a need for their experience in training and some technological issues, but as a fighting force, I don’t think that is necessary.”
Gordon Brown is expected to cut troop numbers significantly next year from the 4,100-strong contingent as Britain’s mission evolves to a more diplomatic presence. But even the status of British non-combat personnel is in doubt because negotiations on their presence beyond this year have yet to begin, Mr al-Maliki said.
A status of forces agreement (Sofa) between Baghdad and London is needed to authorise the presence of any British forces in the country beyond December 31, when a UN Security Council mandate expires. Mr al-Maliki said that he did not know why negotiations had not begun, speculating that the world financial turmoil had distracted the British. “We had decided to start them,” he said.
Britain wants to base its agreement on a similar deal being hammered out between Baghdad and Washington. But divisions on certain issues, in particular the immunity of US troops from Iraqi prosecution, have delayed the signing of that accord.
Mr al-Maliki hopes that the pact with the US will be approved by the end of the year. Failure to do so would force him to ask the UN to extend its mandate for all foreign troops to stay in Iraq. However, if a US-Iraq deal is clinched in time, Britain could be caught out.
“To avoid reaching the critical deadline, I wish for the negotiations between the two sides to start quickly to determine what elements of the force should remain and their specialities,” Mr al-Maliki said. With no such agreement and no new UN mandate, British forces would “lose their legal cover and have to leave Iraq”.
British troops help to train the Iraqi Army and Navy in the south, while a Special Forces unit in Baghdad is used to strike at al-Qaeda and militia targets.
Christopher Prentice, the British Ambassador, said: “It will be good to move out of the artificial relationship in which military aspects had prominence and into a more natural partnership. We fully intend to develop a broad-based relationship with the whole of Iraq. I hope that we will see that happen in the course of next year.”
Mr al-Maliki’s harshest words were for the actions last year of British troops in Basra, which came under Britain’s responsibility after the 2003 invasion. “They stayed away from the confrontation, which gave the gangs and militias the chance to control the city,” he said, referring to a decision by British Forces to leave a palace in Basra for their airport base.
“The situation deteriorated so badly that corrupted youths were carrying swords and cutting the throats of women and children. The citizens of Basra called out for our help . . . and we moved to regain the city.”
Asked whether he thought the British move had been premature, he said: “Very.”
Britain also struck a deal with al-Mahdi Army to stop mortar and rocket attacks, a move that angered Mr al-Maliki. “Of course we were not comfortable and we conveyed our discomfort and regarded it as the beginning of a disaster,” he said. “Had they told us that they wanted to do this, we would have consulted with them and come up with the best possible decision. But when they acted alone the problem happened.”
The Prime Minister said that a crisis was narrowly averted in Basra thanks to his decision to send thousands of Iraqi forces into the city at the end of March to wrest control – a risky operation that almost failed.
“That does not mean that the coalition forces . . . did not provide any help,” he said of that offensive and others across the country. “They did provide help and it was important.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The British Army did a very brave and courageous job in Basra and they managed to control the region and train the Iraqi forces there.
I believe The Iraqi Prime Minister is spot on, it is time to leave the region completely and hand in the security to the Iraqi forces.
Nuaman, London, England
Excellent! It only took 5 years, but job done in the end.
Peter David Lodge, Wakefield,
Whats the big deal about Iraq's "evil" deeds back when it was a major power in the ME?It did what all major powers past,present & future have done,currently do & will do in the future.Only difference is the West always thinks its right & varnishes it up as "high morals" which we know are hollow.
Steve, Toronto, Canada
"...all in the name of oil. " Misery
Can anyone please explain to me how much oil the west has stolen? If it has been, why I am I paying so much for petrol.
If you repeat a lie enough times it becomes the truth eh Misery?
Richard, Jersey,
Misery Tronto I agree...if USA really cares about bringing peace to the world ...(which I pretty much doubt) it could start with it self.
Plus I don't understand why the UK alwyas has to side with the USA... BROWN Bring our boys back ...this was never our fight!!!
Stephanie, Bedfordshire, UK
Let us hope that Mr al-Miliki is right in his belief that Iraq is now stable enough to be left alone. But will the sectarian attacks stop after the withdrawal of British troops? As is often stated, "what concern is it of the West?" Surely the Iraqi's are civilised enough to unite peacefully?!
Mr Robertson, Several, Many
Was it all worth it ?. The cost in lives and misery , the cost to the country in hard cash and the cost to our reputation in the withdrawal from BASRA.
Personally I would like to see a Military Board of Enquiry sit to examine our deployment in detail and acknowledge the lessons learned.
Digby James, Windsor , Berks
We can't afford to stay there any longer. The banking bailout means money has to be saved somewhere. Iraq is top of my list of total wastes of taxpayers money.
Cameo, Berkhamsted, uk
And we should be right on your heels. Enough. We have an economy to repair.
Jim P, Sacramento, California
Great bring them home .
oliver, colchester,
Whats the big deal about Iraq's "evil" deeds back when it was a major power in the ME?It did what all major powers past,present & future have done,currently do & will do in the future.Only difference is the West always thinks its right & varnishes it up as "high morals" which we know are hollow.
Steve, Toronto, Canada
Considering that we only have enough troops there for self-defence rather than any meaningful operations its about time. It was really pointless to leave that many troops there when we withdrew a lot of our men. Political gesturing doesn't make military sense.
Russell, Leeds,
"Mr al-Maliki also criticised a secret deal made last year by Britain with the al-Mahdi Army"
As he pointed, it is better for British troops to withdraw all troops right away!
What is the use of such a double crossing and double dealing force?
So time for Britain to withdraw honorably now
R K Mani , Mumbai, India
Only way out of this is to end oil dependency soon - which is possible, but only via efforts of global scientists who are not beholden to powerful governments. And none have this status.
Religiosity and stupid wars mean nothing except misery and suffering. I'm glad I'm old.
monica, guildford, uk
Good lets go. Think of the money that will be saved, can then be used to save banks and pay multi million bonuses of city ceo's for losing money.
alan, london, uk
Our forces promised that when asked to leave by the Iraqi Prime Minister they would do so. Dragging their heels now would look like they are untrustworthy and that will worsen Britains relationship with Iraq. Gordon Brown MUST take notice and ensure that ALL our combat troops are withdrawn by the end of December.
Peter Dewar-Finch, York, United Kingdom
Misery Toronto, fortunately your soldiers, particularly snipers are a bit more on the ball than you. However, now the government we helped to put in place say they dont want us in their country any more it is definately time to go.
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
it is time to PEACE not WAR, Where is European SCIENTIST to advise peace not war?
Iraq was supported against Iran. WEST gave biological weapon to SADDAM to kill Kurds. Saddam was a good hired killer for WEST.
European Scientist should find peaceful SOLUTION for HUMANKIND not best weapon for ARMY
Hakan, istanbul, TR
Great! Let's go!
Jessica, Reading, UK
Misery, Canada
Your "modern advanced country" of Iraq:
Invaded Iran and Kuwait
Fired missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia
Used WMD (chemical & biological) on its own people
Funded terrorist groups
Tried to develop nuclear weapons
Is it a selective or short memory that you have?
Guy, London, UK
I welcome the comments made by Mr al-Maliki, but until the Whitehouse tells number 10 we can leave, we will have to stay.
Clive, Dartford, Kent
UK Ambassador said:
"It will be good to move out of the artificial relationship in which military aspects had prominence and into a more natural partnership."
What's artificial about laying lives on the line for Iraqi development? Here we go again, spitting on the military when our job is done.
DLL, London,
"I'm sure the great majority in Britain agree completely with Prime Minister al-Maliki's views: yes, "we" should go home.
...By the way, does this also apply to all the Iraqis here? "
Brian Clacey, Croydon, UK
We have no homes to go to, they've been bombed.
al no homie iraqi, london / baghdad, uk / iraq
Now do we get an inquiry? Probably not.
Peter Donson, Southwell, Notts, UK
I can't believe "Howard's" comment. The fact is Iraq has a leader they voted for now and not a dictator who killed hundreds of thousands of his own people!. The only problem with the country now is the power hungry "religious" leaders who want to control it
John, Salford, England
Invador asked to leave peacefully, instead of being kicked out? Merciful Mr. Maliki.
To Doug Beaton - yes Britons are brave people and army, but they was everywhere used by US and Brit gov for non-honorable things.
Andy, Kuwait,
I'm sure the great majority in Britain agree completely with Prime Minister al-Maliki's views: yes, "we" should go home.
...By the way, does this also apply to all the Iraqis here?
Brian Clacey, Croydon, UK
Basra, like Belfast, proved that our forces were not up to the job. What the British army's leaders did in Basra had also been tried - in the "no-go" areas - and failed in Belfast. Our army top brass, it seems, are slow learners. We should also be out of Afghanistan asap as this has become a US war.
Dr David Green, Athens, Greece
There is nothing ungrateful about the Iraq statement, in fact he went as far as thanking the British. All he was pointing out is that the mission has been succesfull & the Iraqies are at a point where they can now look after themselves.
I look at this as a job done well by the British army!
Pete, St Albans, England
Good. We should never have joined America in the destruction of Iraq, but if 'our' Iraqi government says we are no longer needed can we please do as we are asked and bring the army home, and save lives, injuries and money. We now need to husband our resources and not waste them in the desert.
C Smith, Norwich,
Well..pessimish aside, if he's serious, the time to build economic ties and trade has come. For the mutual prosperity of the two people.
Kazuki, Tokyo, Japan
when a 'guest' asks you to leave it is only polite to leave
Mike, Sole Street, England
Hey Misery in Toronto, is that the same modern advanced country that invaded Iran and Kuwait and used chemical weapons against the Kurds.
Iraq has been a *&^£ing nuisance in the Middle East for the past 40 years and still is today.
David, Dubai, UAE
If the ungrateful Iraqi government thinks the British should leave then we should get out tomorrow and leave the sects to kill each other without being caught in the middle.
Iraq was never worth one British soldier's life - now or ever.
David, Dubai, UAE
"The Iraqi arena is open for British companies and British friendship, for economic exchange and positive cooperation in science and education.
Another words, the West finally has their puppet in charge of a Middle East country.
Howard, Manchester,
We all agree! Enough said!
Rod Garr, Miami, USA
Time for our troops to leave and get some well earned r+r. This war has cost us enough in lives and money, neither of which we can afford to lose.
Kevin, Salisbury, UK
Mr al-Maliki, it's called standing on your own two feet, prove you can do it and we will gratefully leave, no British man and woman wants us to be there - albeit the arms and reconstruction industries. Showing you can and want to defend your own people is a god send not an offence.
Lee Owen, Bucharest, Romania
British troops are the finest on the planet, and when they are allowed to fight, acquit themselves with great honor. Maliki has reason to be angry, but not with them. It was the appeasement first politicians who made the deals with the thugs in Basra, and again in Afghanistan with the Taliban.
Doug Beaton, Sanford, USA
Iraq used to be a modern advanced country till the US along with Britain invaded it bombed it to the ground and hanged its leader all in the name of oil.
And for the previous 10 years prior to the invasion had bombed it continuously in order to subdue it ready for take over.
Need I say more.
Misery, Toronto, Canada