Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Families will save up to £200 on a long-distance flight if they go via a European airport rather than flying direct because of a loophole in the Government’s new green tax on aviation.
Passengers can avoid paying tax on the whole journey by changing planes on the Continent, where the tax does not apply. Under the existing tax, which is being abolished, they are charged the same rate regardless of the route.
Ministers claim that the tax will reduce pollution from aircraft but overall emissions will be higher for the thousands of people who save money by catching two flights instead of one and flying hundreds of miles farther. Many will fly east to Paris or Amsterdam before catching connecting flights west to the United States, meaning they will pass back over Britain.
Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, announced last October that the existing direct tax on air passengers would be replaced by a tax on aircraft “to ensure the industry makes a greater contribution towards its environmental costs”. The announcement was rushed out after the Conservatives had proposed the idea at their party conference a few days earlier.
At present, economy-class passengers pay £10 in air passenger duty for short-haul and £40 for long-haul flights. Business and first-class passengers pay £20 for short haul and £80 for long haul.
The new aviation duty, coming into force in November next year, will be paid by airlines. They will pay a fixed sum for each flight, depending on the distance and the weight of the aircraft. The duty will not vary according to the number of passengers carried and will therefore encourage airlines to fill as many seats as possible to spread the cost.
But the duty will only be payable on flights departing from UK airports. Passengers who fly long-haul via a European airport will only have to pay their share of the tax on the initial short-haul flight.
The Government is also raising the overall amount collected in aviation tax from £2.1 billion in this financial year to about £3.6 billion in 2011-12.
The British Air Transport Association (BATA), which represents British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, bmi and 13 other British airlines, said that passengers would pay 75 per cent less tax by flying via a European airport. On routes of more than 3,000 miles, the tax on direct flights will be up to £50 more per person – £200 for a family of four.
Roger Wiltshire, the BATA secretary-general, said: “The new duty will subsidise foreign airlines and airports and damage the environment because people will take off twice and fly longer. It will also damage the economy by undermining our own industry.”
A spokesman for the Treasury said the finer details of the new tax had yet to be decided but it believed few people would be willing to change planes for the sake of lower fare. But Air France-KLM said more than 600,000 people a year already flew from London to Paris or Amsterdam to catch onward long-haul flights.
A spokesman said even a small difference in the fare was enough to attract people to fly through a European hub, where connection times are typically 45 minutes, half the time that it takes to change planes at Heathrow.
Regional airports in Britain are also concerned that the new tax will result in airlines reducing services to Heathrow.
Graeme Mason, head of planning at Newcastle airport, said: “Whether intended or not, the Government is discriminating against UK airlines and airports in favour of overseas airlines and airports.”
Search for a holiday
e.g. Villa in Tuscany
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Governments will never admit the existence of the law of unintended consequences.
Patching up the damage caused by their own, hopefully vote-winning, but ill-thought-out interventions, provides justification for an endless stream of further, value-destroying interventions.
Albert, Paris,
The return flight cost for two of us with Air Transat is £320. The airport tax and surcharges will cost £316.
===
Return flights to Canada for £318.00 each. That's about the same as it cost 10 years ago - no wonder the airlines are unhappy - they were raking it in before!
W Shearer, London, UK
Mind you, these are the same people who can be seen all the time climbing in and out of Range Rovers and Jaguars to travel round the corner in London! Are you listening Mr Brown?
That point should now form part of every Parliamentary question, from now to the next election, or until he flips!
Jeffrey, Durham, England
It's not as if people need another incentive to avoid Heathrow, but for many Scots who do so already the twin effects of excessive flight taxes and the T5 shambles make Paris and Amsterdam rather attractive.
I'm surprised the Irish are so slow off the mark on this one.
Dublin their money?.
Calum McNeill, Portsoy, Scotland
My wife and I plan to fly to Canada to see our daughter in September.
The return flight cost for two of us with Air Transat is £320. The airport tax and surcharges will cost £316.
I don't remember a press launch and fanfare when Labour introduced the airport tax.
Jim , Bicknoller,
A family can save £120 by travelling through a European hub today. If the £200 figure is right this is only an extra £20 per person, who would choose to make an unnecessary connection for £20? The new tax will be per flight, airlines don't have to charge every passenger the same amount and none will
Hal, London,
Do not be fooled. The point of the tax is to raise income not save the planet.
bsamways, London, UK
We are all going to be affected by sea level rises (especially the Dutch) and food shortages so, being the first to tackle the Airlines makes our Government the Good guys not the Bad guys. Don't forget we all live on the same Planet and no doubt Europe will soon follow suit.
John Golding, London,
This shows just how common the common market is
If the tax was common across the common market this would not happen
Martin, Newtown powys,
The government should be concerned with protecting the UK economy more than their imagined concern for polar bears. If they want to drive educated people and business overseas, this is a fantastic way to do it.
Patrick Henry, Bristol,
And what does the Government do with all this Green Taxation. After the disclosures this week, pay their families a bit more, possibly!
Geoff, Sunderland,
It just shows how out of touch these Treasury people are. I regularly fly Transatlantic and would have no problems at all changing flights on the continent, absolutely none whatsoever. And if they think people won't be willing to if it saves them a considerable amount of money is ridiculous.
Paul Downes, Milton Keynes, Bucks