Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Bridget Riley was the leading figure in the 1960s Op Art movement. Short for "Optical Art", her genre was distinguished by the use of optical illusions in paintings and sculptures. In this way, artists could illusory create depth or even movement - sometimes so extreme as to make viewers feel nauseous.
What do you think of this painting? Send an email telling us your opinion to mae@thetimes.co.uk
We're not looking for art historians or academic answers. Whatever your thoughts, we want to hear them. We will print a selection of your comments, alongside our expert’s verdict, in times2 next week.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
its a 2D image showing 3D. better than artists could do at points in relatively recent human history.
Andrew in Woking's presents a good point, too. Open your minds! Surely art is interpretive. Idsn't this piece, too?
MJ, WGC,
Static kenetics, brilliant!
Linda, Bridgend,
The painting might well be called "Inevitability".
It could represent the limitless forgotten past receding and the infinite unknowable future approaching.
Bridget Riley's work operates on many levels and contains more than the eye can meet.
George Falconer, Sidney, Canada
I'd pay not to live with it.
Helen, London, UK
If you look at it in a relaxed way the painting comes alive with spectacular colours. When that happens , you realise how closed you normally are to really seeing what's around you.
Andrew G, Woking, uk
It isn't art, it is science,
Terence Kay, Angmering, UK
Wasn't it the french, centuries ago, who would paint certain cells in uneven squares of red and green to drive selected prisoners potty?
Dennis, Portland OR, The American Colonies
I love it and find it exciting. It's an example of 'seeing as'; I can strive to see it as a series of black marks on white, or to see it as the surfaces retreating and rolling together; so sixties too; brilliant!
John Lawrence, London, U.K.
It seems interesting for the first couple of seconds and then it wears thin very quickly.
Also, it's a little bit too boring to look at it again.
Yuri, Dundalk, Ireland
This picture was painted at a time when people were talking about liberating the senses. Here the artist is teasing our visual senses and we enjoy experimenting with the different effects the picture can have on our perception depending on the angle we look at it. Great fun. Fascinating!
Rose-Helene Esteve, Marlow, GB
Bad wallpaper, worse as art. Go drive a bus, give away the paints.
Hugh Mason, West Chester, Pa, USA
I like it, but it does make my eyes hurt after a moment. It definitely has the feel of motion. I am a little more inclined toward M.C. Escher.
Holly Ross, Worthington, OH, USA
I like op art. It has a place in the history of artistic ideas. Today I could replicate this in five minutes in photoshop, but the fact that the more bizarre kinds of distortion filters exist in graphics programs is I suspect largely due to the influence of op art (and Escher).
_Felix, Nottingham,
I love the way Riley makes my visual sense go awry!! Beautifully drawn and executed pictures.( And this is from a man who prefers portraits to all other forms of painting!!)
Somebody compared the picture to a computer graphic. That in itself says it all about how exactly executed the piece is.
Allan, Cowling,
The movement is just as obvious today as it was 47 years ago. This painting is really what the 1960's was all about.
James Patton, Ballynahinch, Northern ireland
How clever this is, it is hard to comprehend this has been conceived and painted by someone. It is compelling to view, drawing you right in to it and at the same time making you feel you should look away. Riley has really thought and captured a unique concept to turn in to a work of art.
Philip, Bristol, England
I liked the Op Art t-shirts of the mid-80's. It is something fun and not too intellectual. Either you like it or don't. Plus, wearing it, you don't have to look at it.
Paul Montgomery, Durham, North Carolina USA
It makes me feel slightly queezy looking at it - still I suppose that's the point. It's clever and I like it. But I wouldn't hang it on my wall.
Michelle, Edinburgh, Scotland
Love it - would like to own it - its fun!
Poosie, Australia,
They used her art work on the Vertigo label. I remember being fascinated as a kid listening to the music while wathcing the L.P. go round with her design on it. At the time interesting but like many things it doesn't last!
Neil, Molesey, England
it captures the moderism and optimism of the post war boom years. it's not just an optical illusion.
Henry Millar, Dorset, UK
More than a few minutes looking at it, and I think I'd get a headache.
Elizabeth , Portland, USA
It's a simple trick, a gimmick. I saw an exhibition of hers at the Tate a few years back. Maybe this was technically interesting in its day, perhaps, but the world has moved on.
David Mills, London, UK
Scientific, crushing, heartless.
Bill Bird, Wallasey, Wirral
I think her work is terrific - you need to see more of it to realise just how clever and thoughtful it is.
Ms jackson, twickenham, england
Yes, it is Art. In fact, it's fantastic. How many works of art does one see that can actually convey a, genuine, feeling of movement? Furthermore, it's hypnotic, in a really good way.
Marc, Paris, France
I feel as if I am being sucked very rapidly into the picture. What a wonderful way to capture the viewing audience !.
Odila, Plymouth, Devon
it looks more like 3D computer graphics from the mid 1990s not so much like its from a paint brush,... to me.
Judah, Nairobi, Kenya
It's interesting, but is it 'Art'? Decorative, yes. Mathematical perhaps. Clever? Art, not really. A bit like a lot of modern art in those respects. But then how do you define art anyway?
Jamie, Scarborough, England
Compelling.
Faustino, Brisbane, Australia