Rhys Blakely
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland

One of Bollywood's most eagerly awaited films has been dragged into a fierce legal battle, amid allegations that it owes just a little too much to a certain boy wizard.
The Bombay-based producer of Hari Puttar: A Comedy of Terrors is being sued by Warner Bros, the Hollywood studio behind the hugely successful Harry Potter franchise. Hari, the lawsuit alleges, is too close to J.K.Rowling's Harry for comfort.
The Hindi-language children's film, which was shot entirely on the Yorkshire Dales in 2006 and 2007 on a budget of £2 million, tells the story of Hari Prasad Dhoonda, a hapless ten-year-old Punjabi loner who is nicknamed Hari Puttar and moves to Britain.
The plot tells how Hari's father, Professor Dhoonda - and Warner's lawyers may have noted that their client's films feature a Professor Dumbledore - is assigned to work on a top-secret project for the Indian Army. His plans are kept on a computer chip hidden in the family's house.
A series of mishaps results in Hari, who possesses no magic powers, being left home alone when the family departs on holiday. It transpires that an infamous underworld don, Kali Mirchi, has assigned two bungling thugs to steal the secret chip. It is up to Hari to save the chip - and the world.
If the plot brings to mind another film involving a young boy left behind by his family who has to thwart a couple of crooks - Home Alone, the 1990 hit staring Macaulay Culkin - it probably isn't bothering the Indians, who are dismissing claims of plagiarism. Mirchi Movies, the production house behind Hari Puttar, says that any similarity with Ms Rowling's hero is purely coincidental. “Personally, I cannot see any resemblance between the names,” Munish Purii, the chief executive of the company, told The Times. “Hari” was a popular boys' name in India, while “Puttar” meant son, in Punjabi, he explained.
Zain Khan, 11, the boy who plays Hari, agreed. “The movie has nothing to do with Harry Potter,” he said.
Indian pundits have speculated nevertheless that audiences may be confused. “An Indian Harry Potter. You can't think of anything else when confronted with the title Hari Puttar,” the Hindustan Times said.
This is not the first allegation that Ms Rowling's work, which has been translated into 67 languages, including Hindi, has been copied illegally. The Harry Potter brand is estimated to be worth more than £7 billion and the books have sold more than 400 million copies. Bootleggers producing everything from pirate DVDs to counterfeit lunchboxes have made a beeline for the boy wizard and the novels have frequently been leaked online before publication.
The legal action threatens to delay the release of Hari Puttar, regardless of the result. The case is being heard this week in the Bombay High Court and will be seen as a key test of India's intellectual property laws. The film is due for release in India on September 12 and had been expected to reach Britain later this year. “Our project has been in the public domain for two years. It is unfortunate that it is only now that Warner has taken action,” Mr Purii said.
Warner confirmed that it was taking legal action but refused to comment further.
The case will pit one of India's biggest media companies against some of Hollywood's fiercest lawyers. Mirchi Movies is owned by Bennett & Coleman, the privately owned company that publishes The Times of India. The company is valued at up to $25 billion (£13.5 billion). Warner Bros, owned by Time Warner, grossed about $3.4 billion last year from its films.
LEGAL PRECEDENTS
Earlier this year Rowling sued Steve Vander Ark for publishing The Harry Potter Lexicon, a 400-page reference book based on the fan website he ran.
In Harry Potter and Leopard-Walk-Up-to-Dragon, a favourite in China in 2002, Harry encountered sweet and sour rain and joined Gandalf to re-enact scenes from The Hobbit. The publishers stopped publication after Rowling threatened to sue.
Barry Trotter and the Shameless Parody, in which characters called Barry, Len and Ermine square up to Lord Valumart, was a bestseller in 2003.
Belarussian readers have been able to follow the adventures of the grenade-launcher-wielding Porri Gatter.
Harry Potter in Calcutta, in which Harry meets characters from Bengali literature, was withdrawn by its Indian publisher.
Tanya Grotter, the heroine of Tanya Grotter and the Magic Double Bass, rides a double bass, sports a mole instead of a bolt of lightning and attends the Tibidokhs School of Magic. Russian author Dmitri Yemets called his book, which sold more than a million copies, “cultural competition” for the originals.
Rowling gave her backing last year to “fan fiction” not-for-profit publications circulated on the internet.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is not the first time that Warner Brothers have attempted to halt the release of a film due to the title.
Warner Bros came somewhat unstuck when they took on Groucho Marx after Casablanca. Just Google: Groucho Marx Warner Bros.
Nick Barnett, Muizenberg, South Africa
"The case is being heard this week in the Bombay High Court" Warner Bros will not win this fight as the lawsuit will be heard in India. Hari, as indicated by the article, is indeed a common Indian name. Aside from the similar sounding name, this movie has nothing else in common with Harry Potter.
Raymond Sequeira, Mississauga, Canada
Bollywood seems to have been emboldened by getting away with plagiarism for a long time. But, as the Indian movie industry competes for richer markets, it is bound to be challenged for some of its illegal practices which threaten the profits of others. Bollywood will now have to tread with care.
Riaz Haq, San Jose, USA
I remember Hollywood doing the same thing in many of their comedies?? It's a shame, just because Hollywood produced something no one else should?? I've seen many versions of Lord Of the Rings before it was released by Hollywood, maybe some of the smaller movies should seek legal advice.
Adam Webb, Milton Keynes, UK
It's about time someone got in the faces of Bollywood. Quantity does not equal quality and Bollywood has has too often shamelessly ripped off Hollywood films and Western songs with no accreditation or dues. It would force creativity and we might just then have a Hindi film industry to be proud of.
Punit, London, UK
Yet one more rehash - this one of Home Alone! Hope Hari Puttar loses and this turns out to be a lesson to all the plagiarists in Bollywood. Only then will rehashes of Hollywood and western cinema stop, and we can hope to see some respect for original Indian screenplays.
D. Sarma, Toronto , Canada
It seems odd that Hollywood (and indeed the Harry Potter franchise) would choose to attack this film for copyright infringement. Having downloaded and reviewed the script, there are parallels with "Agent Cody Banks" and "Home Alone", but virtually no borrowed items from the Potter franchise.
Jatin Sharma, London, UK
Given the interest this has generated, I would recommend that Universal Pictures have a look at Bollywood's "Good Tussi Great Ho" - a line for line knock off of Bruce Almighty, starring Govinda (Jim Carey's character) and Amitab Bachin (who plays the role of God/ Morgan Freeman's character).
Jatin Sharma, London, UK
Oh come off it Warner (and JKR), and get off your high horses. It's a film about a boy who is nick-named Hari Puttar. Your action is as riduculous asd McDonalds suing anyone percieved as infringing thier copywrite to the 'Mc' prefix. Get a life, stop wasting your money and sack your legal team.
Ron, Milton Keynes, UK
There's nothing wrong with a spoof movie.
What's more, the Harry Potter saga is not all that good anyway.
Robert, Slough,